A Shortage of Mexicans
We Have A Severe Shortage Of Mexicans, Puerto Ricans
And Other Latinos in Wisconsin
By Alan Eisenberg, alan@alaneisenberg.com, 414-344-3333
There's no question in my mind. We have a severe shortage of Mexicans in this country. We need more Mexicans in Wisconsin, too, and as soon as possible. We also need more Latinos from all of the other Latin countries, Latin America, Central America, the Caribbean and Europe. Edward James Olmos has said it many times: "We are the dominant culture in the Western Hemisphere." We need to get with the program. This country will soon find out what "Tsunami" means when it experiences the soon-coming tidal wave of Latinos. They will not be turned back, they will not be stopped. Don't we already know that New York is blessed with over a million persons who are either from Puerto Rico or are of Puerto Rican descent? This proportion is obviously unfair; we need more Puerto Ricans in Milwaukee and have a severe shortage here, too. Why should New York be the place where all of these beautiful, talented people reside? It's not fair, we want our share.
Professor Javier Tapia of UW-M is a globalist whose reasoning is overwhelming. He recognizes no borders in North America. He'd like to see them all abolished. He wants Americans to help Mexicans, and he wants Mexicans to help Americans. The concept is irresistible in its conception. If I had told you thirty years ago that there would soon be a United States of Europe, you would have argued that I was insane. It has happened. Today, Euros are worth more than dollars, too. Tapia advocates that one day all of North America will and should be one nation, under, God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. He's right. It will be the United States of North America.
This business of building walls is ridiculous, too. Be sure to follow this controversy in the media to the best of your ability. The president recently conceded that he would have the United States build a 350 mile wall. Nothing will prevent people from going around it, under it, over it, and through it. Why would we erect an insult to our wonderful Mexican brothers and sisters? Ronald Reagan was praised the world around when he took down the Berlin wall. "Wall advocates" or "Wall-Nuts", if you will, say that the Berlin wall was erected was to keep the East Germans in, and they want to keep the Mexicans out. Obviously Reagan didn't agree. If any walls get built, I hope they have thousands of gates, with thousands of swinging doors. What about Canada? We need more Canadians around here, too. Many people already think that Canada is already a collection of Northern American states, United States suburbs! Think about it, we wouldn't have to teach those people English either, however, we would have to teach most of them Spanish. I don't know why it never gets mentioned around here, but Canada has a substantial Latino population already. If walls get built, there will be a dramatic incursion of Mexicans through Canada, not to mention other Latinos. Jamaicans have always been able to travel freely to Canada. Latinos are wonderful seamen and ocean travelers, too. Mexicans are already arriving daily through the Gulf Coast, the Atlantic Coast, and the Pacific Coast. Getting from Baha California to California is a short hop. Will we next build walls on all of the coastlines? Ridiculous, isn't it? If this country really has spare money to start erecting idiotic walls, let's put in for one around Wisconsin. We need to keep the red-necks and bigots out. Let's demand that all red-necks and bigots must register and be documented. If we find any here without papers, they will be deported to Mississippi where they belong. Then, next, we demand a wall around Milwaukee. Only Latinos and Latino sympathizers should be allowed in. We have enough Gringos here anyway. We can't become another Gringoville. We need more Mexicans and Latinos here.
There's an obvious solution to all of this: we must annex Mexico and Canada before they annex us; it will be the United States of North America. Remember that you read about it here, first. Isn't that the basic premise of NAFTA anyway? We must do some things quickly to get the ball rolling. To get Sensennbrenner on our side, we declare him an Honorary Latino. He will become Senior Sensenbrenner, our amigo. I think that history will someday regard him as our Savior. Think about it. If you think of him as a "Roman" and you remember that the Romans didn't like Jesus Christ, look at that backlash that their activites against Jesus caused. We can call him F. Pontius Sensenbrenner. Kindly remember that Mexico has about a million citizens named Jesus. Yup, it's Senior Sensenbrenner against the Jesuses. He will go the way of all Romans and tyrants. It's been 2000 years, and the world has still never forgiven the Romans. Jesus, on the other hand, has done well.
The recently passed Senate bill is nothing more than "amnesty", Sensenbrenner says. He doesn't know the meaning of the word: "am·nes·ty" according to the dictionary is defined as "authority (as a government) by which pardon is granted to a large group of individuals." No one has asked for a pardon. You must commit a crime to get a pardon. If coming to this country, doing jobs that others won't do, working your butt off so you can support your families, and live like a model citizen is a crime, then I'm the King of Siam. Give me a break. The one who needs amnesty is that Roman guy, F. Pontius Sensenbrenner. He has no monopoly on the granting of amnesty. Let's grant him amnesty, he needs it.
Want to comment on this Blogs?
Sign up to Edit Red and you will be able to comment on Blogs and get access to: Upload your own stories and poems, get readers and their feedback, promote your work...
|
 |
|