writing community
Sign In Here | Lost Password | FREE Sign Up
E-mail: Password:
Remember login  
The place for writers:
Upload your writing in minutes, receive peer feedback from other writers, poets, authors, then get your work published out there in the real world.       Learn how other writers are doing it.

 
ThePenguin
Peter Budvietas
New Zealand, Auckland

My Bookshop
Words: 644
Access: Public
Comments: 3

Forward to a friend
Print Version
E-mail this writer E-mail this user 
View Author profile
Add to Readers  




Formula Writing????

The last few entries do seem to imply that there is a formula for writing stories. After all, they give a bunch of equations that LOOK like formulae:
S(tory) = C(onflict) + A(ction) + R(esolution)
C(onflict) = W(ant) + O(bstacles)
Need = Emotion + Want

It all looks so simple! Just put these elements into some set of words, and you've got a story!

The 'equations' do help the writer create a story. It might be trite, bad, indifferent, but every story has them at a very basic level. But what the reader sees is something more than the basic skeleton.

Think of some good stage magicians. If you know how they do their 'magic', then the tricks are extremely simple. They look spectacular, but often the trick depends on simple sleight of hand, or distracting the audience or other such non-magical activity. The 'magic' is that the audience does NOT see the props behind the scenes that make it all happen on stage.

This is where Oscar Wilde's adage comes into play, the one about Art depending on the Artist being invisible.

We all know that someone painted a masterpiece, or wrote a masterpiece, or whatever the right term is for the particular form of Art. It's all about the maker's hand in the creation not being seen or detected. The harder it is to detect the hand of the writer, the better the piece can be ' the READER makes it their own.

As writers, we all start with the same basic tools ' words. Most of us know how to spell, or at least look up the right spelling. We know the right grammatical constructs to convey what we mean to the reader (perhaps not the proper technical terms, like gerunds and machiavels, but we usually have our own names for the constructs). We know that we need to proof-read to correct the mistakes we often leave in a draft. It doesn't take much effort to look up how to format a manuscript, or to check the guidelines for submissions to publishers and editors. We might even use a style guide, or use a particular approach to references and bibliography.

These are details that are our props in making the presentation to the READER, after we have the story all set out.

But our real magic is in hiding the props, including the 'equations' underlying the story.

We don't TELL the reader that 'C' is the Conflict, 'A' is the Action, 'R' is the Resolution. We don't TELL the reader that 'W' is the Want, and 'O' are the Obstacles.

The Reader finds them as we have revealed them in the story we are telling. The less obvious our involvement in the revelations, the more the reader puts of him/herself into the story, and the greater the entertainment value of the story. We want the reader to forget that we are the story tellers, and feel that HE/SHE is telling the story to him/herself. We want the reader to BUY INTO the story we have told, to suspend disbelief, and make the story their own.

It doesn't matter about genre ' a good story is a good story. I've enjoyed stories here, even though I don't usually read pieces in the specific genre, or the specific style. What does matter is that we learn to hide the skeleton ' the equations or formulae ' in such a way that the reader is not aware of them.

If we can do it, then we are successful storytellers/writers. We might not get everything published. Perhaps nothing we write gets accepted by regular publishers, but we will BE the best writers we can be.

As writers, our job is to WRITE. If we don't WRITE, then there's nothing that can be published. So'

Want to comment on this Blogs?
Sign up to Edit Red and you will be able to comment on Blogs and get access to: Upload your own stories and poems, get readers and their feedback, promote your work...
Sign up






[Back to top]


My Bookshop

Comments  
ThePenguin Comment by: ThePenguin - 2006-09-16 17:52
Add to Readers
      
Hi, Linda:
There are formulae and then there are formulae. The difference depends, not on whether we use them or not, but on how much the formula becomes part of us, as writers.

Hi, Pam!
Forget about being like us - what's crucial is becoming yourself; that's the place of the magic. Anyone can have it - it just takes practice, and then more practice. Just tell your stories, and eventually, the appearance of relying on formule becomes less obvious.
Comment by: - 2006-09-16 17:40
Add to Readers
      
The more stories and poems I read on this site, the more I want to be just like each and everyone of you. I do not know if I have the magic you speak of but it makes me want to keep trying. ty
Jamilah Comment by: Jamilah - 2006-09-14 21:03
Add to Readers
      
Yes. The magic of creative expression. Writing is about much more than formulas--though I think there are those who believe otherwise (and sometimes they even land contracts with major publishers).
1

Sponsored Ads


Added to Library of:

By ThePenguin

Featured Writers

Advertising - Terms & Conditions - Short Story Submissions - Contact - Writing Competitions - Writing Links - Book Promotion - Sky-Tribe.com - alanemmins.com
  Member short stories, poems, comments and other contributions are owned by the poster.
Copyright 2003 - 2007 Edit Red I/S