writing community
Sign In Here | Lost Password | FREE Sign Up
E-mail: Password:
Remember login  
The place for writers:
Upload your writing in minutes, receive peer feedback from other writers, poets, authors, then get your work published out there in the real world.       Learn how other writers are doing it.

 
ThePenguin
Peter Budvietas
Online
New Zealand, Auckland

My Bookshop
Words: 611
Access: Public
Comments: 9

Forward to a friend
Print Version
E-mail this writer E-mail this user 
View Author profile
Add to Readers  




The Blink Factor

I've just finished a book called 'Blink'. Coming so soon after NaNoWriMo, it seems kind of appropriate ' the month (thanks to other happenings) seems to have gone in a 'blink'.

The idea behind 'Blink' is that we, as people, get trained out of using our intuition, that sudden insight that helps us solve problems that apparently have no solution (or, to be more rigorously correct, no general solution).

I first encountered the phenomenon was back in the sixties, when the Rubick's Cube was all the rage. You see, I was one of those who 'solved' it in less than 30 seconds. It didn't matter how well the cubelets were mixed up: hand it to me, and zip-zip-zip-zip, and it was done.

Then somebody asked me how I did it'

I described a few 'moves', and broached the idea of 'orbits' ' how a particular square moved around the cube based on doing the same set of moves a few times, until the square came back to the same place on the cube. That led to identifying six or ten different sequences of moves that could eventually lead to a solved Cube ' a 'generalized' solution.

Sounds good since I could ALWAYS find a solution, except that I could no longer solve the Cube in less than two minutes! Most often, it would take me under five, and a really mixed up one could take up to 10 minutes.

What does this have to do with NaNo, and writing?

When we write, we are really working from our intuition, our ability to have insight into a problem. We set a scenario (the problem) and couch it in terms of our characters and their interactions. Then we let the characters run with the story, and put what they do into words.

That's why, in our minds, we think of the stories we tell as brilliant. In all honesty, they really are as brilliant as we think they are. Sometimes, we seem the story as complete, from start to finish; at other times, we might see it as a series of episodes, each episode complete in itself.

The key word is 'COMPLETE'. The stories/episodes are complete in our minds.

Then we start to write the story, and that takes a 'generalized' solution ' words, spelling, grammar, plot, subplot, inventions, etc.

An aside: do you know that most dreams, no matter how complete they are, last between two and five seconds? That's true, even when the dream, as we 'remember' it, takes hours or even days in its own timeframe.

Our need to stick to 'formulas' ' the structures, the desire to make the story shareable with others, etc. ' is our attempt to be objective. We want the story to be perfect in all its elements. When we do, the intuitive (complete) version of what we are trying to write does not really match what we actually write. Any story we put down on paper (that is making it objective) just can't match the perfection of our mind-story (totally subjective).

That's why NaNo is so important. Not because it gets us to write 50,000 words (or more), but because we don't have time to try and make it 'perfect'.

We need the imperfect stuff that comes out of NaNo (or whatever your equivalent is) so that we can hone the piece to better match our perfect image of the story.

So, forget about waiting for inspiration for your magnificent piece ' it's already there. You just need the gumption to look at it in its imperfect state, its NaNo edition, if you will.

That's what make a writer ' not the words written!

Want to comment on this Blogs?
Sign up to Edit Red and you will be able to comment on Blogs and get access to: Upload your own stories and poems, get readers and their feedback, promote your work...
Sign up






[Back to top]


My Bookshop

Comments  
Boonrassi Comment by: Boonrassi - 2008-02-24 09:49
Add to Readers
      
jeez... thats fine technical writing.
i really enjoyed that.
where do i find a copy of NaNoWriMo?
the rubiks cube was invented in 74'.. production started in 77'.
thanks,
T
Juan2 Comment by: Juan2 - 2007-02-10 01:26
Add to Readers
      
Good call. Every statue used to just be a block of stone til somebody decided to carve it.

Orbits, eh? I think "Rubiks" is about to get another hit on Google.

I didn't know that about dreams. If that's true, then it absolutely coincides with a theory I have involving space-time travel by means of dreams (in that: time travel is reliant upon going faster than the speed of light; and our thoughts are the only things we currently know of capable of traveling faster than light, as evidenced by the ability for a dream to at once be hours, days long in one dimension and merely a few seconds in another - it's all relative). Anyway, that's another Google search.

Your book sounds pretty interesting. Your blog alone ignited my thoughts! Is it a story? (plot, characters and all that) or a non-fic?

Happy Writings.
Tom Comment by: Tom - 2007-01-04 04:33
Add to Readers
      
This is a a very enlightening blog/essay -
there was somewhat of a weight lifted from me when I wrote the final chapter in nano, which was, when i think back now, probably the term "complete" landing on the other side of the scales and balancing the piece out. On the other side of the scales (and the thing that had been weighing so heavy) is as digs puts it, was my "pervasive inner censor".

Nano is a method of torture which forces us to write a story we would otherwise be too self-restricted to sit down and reveal...
Jamilah Comment by: Jamilah - 2006-12-05 21:39
Add to Readers
      
It's like trying to do something when someone's watching. It never turns out as well as when you just do it. This is a very useful piece of advice. And yes, NaNo did help by shutting up the internal editor and making us "just write."

Have you tried to explain writer's intuition to a non-writer? It's hard.
digs Comment by: digs Online- 2006-12-04 13:09
Add to Readers
      
Maybe that isn't the best word, Peter. I was thinking of it constantly lurking in the shadows.
1 2 Next

Sponsored Ads


By ThePenguin

Featured Writers

Advertising - Terms & Conditions - Short Story Submissions - Contact - Writing Competitions - Writing Links - Book Promotion - Sky-Tribe.com - alanemmins.com
  Member short stories, poems, comments and other contributions are owned by the poster.
Copyright 2003 - 2007 Edit Red I/S