writing community
Sign In Here | Lost Password | FREE Sign Up
E-mail: Password:
Remember login  
The place for writers:
Upload your writing in minutes, receive peer feedback from other writers, poets, authors, then get your work published out there in the real world.       Learn how other writers are doing it.

 
Elinki
Chris McGuffin
United States, Colorado, Arvada

Words: 803
Access: Public
Comments: 5

Forward to a friend
Print Version
E-mail this writer E-mail this user 
View Author profile
Add to Readers  




Restriction of Passion

Passion excels humanity


While money corrupts it


 


            Passion is the urge of the human spirit and soul making an individual's passion their purpose in life; money corrupts or blocks this.


 


            Originally an artist creates to fulfill his desire to express and share himself with others, thus fulfilling his purpose in life. At this point his art is pure/raw emotion and thought. That is until he observes the foundation of society which he discovers is money. Realizing this, he understands that he must sell himself (his art) in order to attain a foothold in society so he may continue to share himself with the rest of humanity. Over time he is moved by money so as to be apart of society making any art he creates at this point impure. He now creates to appease as many people as possible in order to collect as much money as he can obtain. In the music world these are known as sell-outs, they have literally given up themselves for money. When seeing, hearing, or reading art that had the soul intention to make money for the individual at the time of its creation has a fake and unattractive feel to it, thus defeating the purpose of art and ultimately defeating its intent to make money; art that is created for the intention to make money is not real art. The artist has lost themselves to the world of money.


 


Genuine art is pure and true freedom of the spirit and soul.


 


            A society which is based on money will always have suffering and unhappiness within it because money cannot come without greed. The greedy see money as power and with power comes freedom, but they are not truly free because money dictates their freedom. A greedy individual has total disregard for others around them and only seeks to take all that others have; creating suffering and discontent in his fellow man.


 


Another's freedom and happiness is never worth destroying in order to achieve a life of luxury.


 


            Now imagine a world without money. I am sure most cannot because it is all they know, or they think of communism. The initial intent of communism was utopia, but the flaw in it was that there was a means of total control of the masses through dictatorship, thus restricting an individual's freedom and passion. Now look at our current government, it has the true potential of utopia because we have our basic freedoms. The only flaw is that money governs what we can do; with money we are not truly free. If we were to remove money from society but sustain our current laws society would eventually mature into a utopia and humanity on the whole can attain enlightenment because there would be less in the way of an individual's passion. Granted, if we were to do so, production of materials would come to a crawl because all those that are working jobs that they are unhappy in and are only working to make money would quit because they would be truly free, but all those that are fulfilling their passion(s) would stay where they are at, the only difference being they would no longer be making money. Over time people will only be making and producing products they have a passion for and all these products would be free to all who want them. Theft would be almost non-existent because if someone wants or needs something there is nothing stopping them from getting it at the source. As for things of importance such as a house or car will have a deed or title to them, linking them to the individual. Theft or breaking and entering would still be illegal.


 


Utopia is up to us.


 


            The flaw in the ideal society I have loosely outlined is humanity itself. The only way it would not work is if individuals continue to have total disregard for their fellow human beings and their own spirit and soul. If humanity does not see every individual within it as an equal and a vital piece of society then humanity would destroy itself which it would undoubtedly deserve if this were the case. With the subtraction of money humanity's negative qualities have less to feed on; these qualities will only have what resides within the individual to feed on, thus allowing humanity's full potential into fruition or humanity's ultimate destruction.


 


Want to comment on this Blogs?
Sign up to Edit Red and you will be able to comment on Blogs and get access to: Upload your own stories and poems, get readers and their feedback, promote your work...
Sign up






[Back to top]
Comments  
nadinesellers Comment by: nadinesellers - 2007-10-29 12:57
Add to Readers
      
allow me to add another perspective here; on several occasione i have lived in a barter system, the human factor still intrudes in the physical or mental enslaving of the needier ones. kindness is not always repaid, and labor not often evenly redistributed: hence dystopia ensues at any rate. a thief's mind is criminal in or out of the legal perspective. with all comments at heart, let's re-read this wonderful piece and achieve what you have opened up.
vencelnovakov Comment by: vencelnovakov - 2007-04-06 06:51
Add to Readers
      
I enjoyed your perspective, insight and honesty in this blog. But I cannot help but think that money also 'controls' in a positive way. I would love a society of bartering, where one would have to work to make their way - sloth is a terrible disease - and a uniquely human one. Thank you for sharing.
jaimedunkle23 Comment by: jaimedunkle23 - 2007-02-13 11:46
Add to Readers
      
the sad thing is, is that if they were to just be true to themselves, success would probably continue effortlessly.
Robert Barlow Comment by: Robert Barlow - 2007-02-08 18:37
Add to Readers
      
Chris, this is an excellent essay. I especially liked how to the point you were. While reading your essay I was struck by the contrast between greed and passion. At least that was the contrast that I saw most clearly, because greed not only includes the love of money, but any materialistic desire that would enslave us. You are right, "Utopia is up to us." :) --Robert Barlow
fishbowl42 Comment by: fishbowl42 - 2007-01-24 14:54
Add to Readers
      
Overall a wonderfully and very thought provoking essay! Your sentiment about money echoes much of my own. If don't mind I would like to add some of my own thoughts about the subject. I think there are many laws that need to be striped from our society that is a result of centralized economic power that would further this Ideal. I think for the most part intellectual property rights, as they stand now, benefit neither society nor the creator. I believe they contribute to the ??sell out? syndrome you speak off, and only benefit the arbitrary authority of publishing firms, record labels, and film studies, etc. I also feel that property can only legitamently exist in the result of human labor, and the exchanging there of (ideally in a gift economy), but that natural resources are not a product of human labor and should morally be held communicatively.
1

Sponsored Ads


By Elinki

Featured Writers

Advertising - Terms & Conditions - Short Story Submissions - Contact - Writing Competitions - Writing Links - Book Promotion - Sky-Tribe.com - alanemmins.com
  Member short stories, poems, comments and other contributions are owned by the poster.
Copyright 2003 - 2007 Edit Red I/S