writing community
Sign In Here | Lost Password | FREE Sign Up
E-mail: Password:
Remember login  
The place for writers:
Upload your writing in minutes, receive peer feedback from other writers, poets, authors, then get your work published out there in the real world.       Learn how other writers are doing it.

 
Matthew Eduard Abuelo
Matthew Abuelo
United States, New York, New York City

My Bookshop
Words: 1750
Access: Public
Comments: 4

Forward to a friend
Print Version
E-mail this writer E-mail this user 
View Author profile
Add to Readers  




John McCain The Neo Con

A lot has happened since I started this piece which was be Part Two of a series focusing on the advisors of the candidates in both political Parties. Since there are only two, yes two, Republican candidates left, and only one has any real relevancy in the race at this point, I decided to focus on John McCain who is the current media sweetheart and self proclaimed war hero.

One of the biggest misconceptions about McCain, thanks in part to a media that goes out of its way not to challenge the paradigm of the moment, is that he is the most "liberal" of all the Republican candidates Even some Liberals have swallowed the Kool Aid on this one. But looking at McCain’s proposed policies and the inside personalities that he surrounds himself with, it becomes painfully obvious that he is every bit the Neo Con that Bush is and maybe even more. In fact he has aligned himself with the likes of Paul Wolfowitz and other players in the Project for the New Century who support the remaking of the world in the image of the United States.

As reporter Robert Dreyfuss noted on"Democracy Now", McCain wishes to form “The League Of Democracies” which would by-pass the United Nations when it comes to going to war with various countries and build a stronger front in NATO against Russia in Central Asia. This group would re-establish US unilateralism against his version of the “Axis of Evil” with what he calls, “Rogue State Roll-Back.” This means targeting Governments which McCain sees as being hostile to the United States. The McCain plan would allow the US to overthrow these Governments and install those leaders that are sympathetic to the Neo Con agenda. The most often cited countries are Iraq, Cuba, North Korea, Iran and Syria. He is now looking to become increasingly more antagonistic towards those countries that challenge US dominance in the world, most notably, Russia and China.

In fact McCain has already called for the removal of Russia from the G8 along with inviting several former Soviet nations, like the Ukraine and Georgia into the governing body. Such a move would send a firestorm throughout Moscow. McCain said that he would forward the Bush plan of building a satellite missile systems in Poland and other Eastern European countries but he would not concern himself with Moscow. Such an act would strain the US relationship with Russia to the point that we find could ourselves in a no-win situation in some of the world’s problems including those throughout the Middle East and, equally important we could find ourselves in another arms race with Moscow.
Those who think that voting for John McCain is a vote against the neoconservative agenda, should take a look at his advisers. The following is a detailed look at some of the men who shaped the ideas and plans that McCain the Neo Con is now pushing under the guise of “keeping out country save.”

On top of the list is Terry Nelson, a Bush-Cheney insider. According to the group Media Matters, Nelson has been linked to some perverse scandals surrounding the Republican Party in general and Tom Delay in particular. Perhaps most infamous was campaign ad aimed at Rep. Harold Ford Jr, an African American candidate for Congress in Tennessee. The ad closed with a white woman telling Ford to call her, an obvious attempt to incite rage from white conservative communities of Tennessee. Questions also surround Nelson’s involvement in a phone jamming operation in 2002 used to disrupt Democratic campaigns in New Hampshire.
Then there is William Kristol, ultra-conservative writer for the “Weekly Standard” and one of the architects of the neo-con think tank, falls in line with the rest of the cohorts in the far right wing media and political spin doctors, believe in American hegemony on a global scale. Shortly after the fall of the Soviet Union Kristol stood at forefront of the Republican radical fringe calling for the reshaping of the global politic to serve US interests, even at the expense of the international community.

Like Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz and others, Kristol saw Iraq as a starting point for what has become the march for the US’s expanded empire. He has long been promoting the idea in article after article in the Standard. In 1998 he signed onto a letter With Paul Wolfowitz and Donald Rumsfeld which urged the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. In the letter, the group floated the erroneous claim of Hussein possessing weapons of mass destruction and his intent to use them against US interests. They claimed that the Iraqi government could cause the largest crisis in Middle East since the end of the cold war, “We are writing to you because we are convinced that current American policy toward Iraq is not succeeding, and that we may soon face a threat in the Middle East more serious than any we have known since the end of the Cold War…” For the full contents of the letter go to http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm.


After Bill Clinton snubbed the request, the group sent a letter to Newt Gingrich and former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, saying that the US should build and maintain a strong presence in the area. The letter can be viewed through the link. http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqletter1998.htm. To their dismay Bill Clinton absolutely rejected the proposal to overthrow the man that George H.W. Bush put into power in 1963. The authors of PNAC had to wait a few more years before they got their man George W Bush.
Every time we hope that Henry Kissinger once and for all finally disappears into the great ether of horrid war criminals, he always seems to come back. Kissinger, certainly the least deserving of recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, is quietly doing what he does best inside the McCain camp. For those who know Kissinger's history, there are far too many examples of war crimes connected to Richard Nixon’s right hand man to fit into one blog. They range from his support for the invasions East Timor and Cambodia to the attempted cover up of the Mai Lai Massacre to the bloody ascent of Augusto Pinochet in Chile in the early 1970s. Given this history one must really be worried about the possible war with Iran under a John McCain presidency. Kissinger has never seen a war crime that he doesn’t support as long as it moves forward an agenda. Up until the late 1980s, he rationalized the US support for General Suharto with the excuse that it was necessary to "fight Communism". Today he will most certainly use the generic tag of “the war on terrorism” when discussing any future violations of human rights.

While the great PR firm which calls itself the media has been transfixed on comments made by Barack Obama’s former pastor Reverend Jeremiah Wright, there seems to be limited interest in speeches made by controversial reverend and John McCain supporter John Hagee. The Texas preacher is well known among the Catholic community. He is best known for calling the Roman Catholic church as the “great whore,” apostate church," the "anti-Christ" and "a false cult system" that inspired Adolph Hitler to initiate the Holocaust.

Recently McCain was asked about the support he received from Hagee, during ABC’s news show, "This Week With George Stephanopoulos." Host Stephanopoulos asked McCain if it was a mistake to solicit and accept the endorsement of such a figure. At first, McCain said it was a mistake but seconds later contradicted himself by saying, that he is happy to have it. According to a report by Glen Greenwald of salon.com, Tim Russert had a chance to press the issue of the support but instead, seemed content with the kid gloves approach when dealing with the issue. This came after a show where Russert continued to weigh on Obama to denounce the support he received from the Reverend Louis Farrakhan, which Obama did.
John McCain has often praised Hagee as an honest man and was proud to receive his support. But lets keep in mind Hagee's Catholic comments are actually one of the more benign statements he has made over the years. Here are some of Hagee's Greatest Hits. On Terry Gross’s show on NPR, John Hagee stated that “All Muslims are killers and we can thus never negotiate with any of them.”

During the same interview, he claimed that “God caused Hurricane Katrina to wipe out New Orleans because it had a gay pride parade the week before and was filled with sexual sin.” Then there is this little number, “The End Times Rapture is imminent and the U.S. Government must do what it can to hasten it, which at minimum requires a war with Iran and undying, absolute support for a unified Israel, including all Occupied Territories.”
So while Barack Obama has been forced to explain comments and connections to Wright, McCain can openly hug Hagee with no real in-depth questions from any of the major networks. But this has been the pattern of the media's handling of John McCain; not only with Hagee but with all of his advisors. Let one of the Democratic candidates slip up, however, and you're guaranteed that gaffe is all you will hear for months afterwards.

But John McCain, as stated above, has become the media’s new darling, to the point where they are willing to sell McCain "the moderate" while McCain the Neo-Con furthers the Project For The New American Century’s radical agenda.
Until next time.

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/02/28/hagee/index.html
http://mediamatters.org/items/200612130001

http://www.counterpunch.org/leopold02192003.html









http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/John_McCain_China.htm

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/03/21/politics/main3958889.shtml
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=a7GaNy_qwACo&refer=us

http://www.democracynow.org/2008/3/26/a_century_in_iraq_replacing_un

http://www.antiwar.com/bandow/?articleid=12559

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&domains=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.counterpunch.org&q=John+McCain%27s+Advisors&btnG=Search&sitesearch=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.counterpunch.org

http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&channel=s&hl=en&q=Max+Boot&btnG=Google+Search

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2007/05/inner_circle_john_mccain.html

http://www.zpub.com/un/wanted-hkiss.html

http://www.commondreams.org/views02/0611-03.htm

Want to comment on this Blogs?
Sign up to Edit Red and you will be able to comment on Blogs and get access to: Upload your own stories and poems, get readers and their feedback, promote your work...
Sign up






[Back to top]


My Bookshop

Comments  
Matthew Eduard Abuelo Comment by: Matthew Eduard Abuelo - 2008-05-23 06:52
Add to Readers
      
First, McCain sought out his endorsement. That’s how he got it. Second, I’m not going to touch the Obama Hamas remark since it was an insult disguised as question and lacked any real reasoning when one looks at policies. Third most Americans consider themselves moderates with only 32% considering themselves far right. What relevance does the dynamics of Hagee’s and McCain’s relationship have? McCain has in the past held this jackass up as a moral figure. And finally, since you call those of us on the left nut jobs, I wonder what you think of the “Army Of God” members who blow up prenatal clinics.
Jorbian Comment by: Jorbian - 2008-05-22 22:40
Add to Readers
      
It is still not the same as Obama-Wright. As I said, McCain is not and was never in Hagee's congregation. McCain and Hagee's religious beliefs are as different as mine are from the Dali Lama's. I've visited McCain's actual church, its in Phoenix and it is as tame as a kitten if Wright or Hagee's Churches are tigers. So here's a question: if an endorsement makes Hagee McCain's minister, does that make the leader of Hamsas Obama's Imam? Here's another one, you are obviously a leftist, if you were running for president, wouldn't you want the support of both the far left communist wack jobs and moderates who could register for either party as well?
Matthew Eduard Abuelo Comment by: Matthew Eduard Abuelo - 2008-05-16 07:49
Add to Readers
      
Actually McCain sought his endorsement and highly praised him. Further more just the fact that he is now aligning himself with Hagee should probably speak volumes. About Wright, remember he grew up and lived about half his life under the Jim Crow laws. And he still served in the military. Should not criticize the wrongs that he had to go through?
Jorbian Comment by: Jorbian - 2008-05-15 21:33
Add to Readers
      
McCain is not a member of John Hagee's congregation. McCain was not married by John Hagee. McCain was not baptized by John Hagee. McCain did not ever call John Hagee his mentor. There is nothing, there is no connection at all between John Hagee and McCain. If there is one which has been cleverly hidden, I would be very interested in being provided with evidence of it.
1

Sponsored Ads


By Matthew Eduard Abuelo

Featured Writers

Advertising - Terms & Conditions - Short Story Submissions - Contact - Writing Competitions - Writing Links - Book Promotion - Sky-Tribe.com - alanemmins.com
  Member short stories, poems, comments and other contributions are owned by the poster.
Copyright 2003 - 2007 Edit Red I/S